We label the post COVID-19 period the “New Century” to reflect acceleration of the digital economy as both businesses and consumers adjusted to the pandemic. Much of the past will remain just that—in the past—and less useful for forecasting the outlook for many sectors. The new forces will likely lead to major differences between corporate haves and have nots. In our view, the haves will grow much larger and increase their dominance.
As the economy adjusts to aftershocks from the pandemic, Americans will need to adhere to current health care protocols until vaccines become broadly available — still an uncertain date. Such adherence will prove critical to both limiting the virus’ spread and speeding economic recovery. Unfortunately, early in July the seven-day average in daily new cases increased to record highs. This resurgence, principally in the sunbelt states as well as California, will likely slow the expected economic recovery in the third quarter as states rollback their reopening efforts.
The Organization for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) compared the November 2019 World GDP growth forecast (green dashed line) to the GDP growth forecasts in 2020 and 2021 based on either a “Single-hit” scenario or a “Double-hit” scenario. As the Figure 1 illustrates, the impact of a “Double-hit” scenario could further reduce economic growth by an additional 3% to 6%.
As investors, we scratch our heads seeing the “V” shaped equity market recovery marked against this cloudy economic outlook. Partially explaining this difference may reflect severe pandemic damage to small businesses — which contribute to half of U.S. GDP. This economic dispersion shows up when comparing performance of the S&P 500 index — comprising large corporations — to the Russell 2000—representative of the small business sector. So far this year through July 15th, the S&P 500 grew 0.4% while the Russell 2000 declined nearly 11.4%.
2021 Earnings—Historic Results Provide Less Basis For Forecasts—Result More Than Normal Earnings SurprisesSecond quarter earnings reports—or losses—will be rolling out this month. Consensus expectations look for quarterly earnings to decline 40-50% year-over-year. Investors will not likely dwell on expected poor second quarter earnings reports but instead focus on management’s outlook for the remainder of this year and 2021. For the full year, a good percentage of companies will use 2020 as a “kitchen sink” year by writing off their past mistakes on top of already depressed operating earnings or losses.
Earnings reality will likely return to equity markets in 2021. Analysts as well as companies will likely base their earnings forecasts on historical operating, income, and balance sheet relationships. However, in the “New Century,” the past will not provide as useful a basis for forecasting future results. Therefore, greater than normal earnings surprises—either positive or negative—seem likely through at least the first half of next year. Greater individual stock volatility will likely result with such earnings surprises.
Typically, the service industry (approximately 70% of GDP) buffers cyclical declines experienced by manufacturing (11% of GDP.) In contrast, mandated lockdowns brought consumer service industries including restaurants, entertainment, travel, tourism, and other consumer service sectors to a near halt. As a result, rather than acting as a buffer, services put greater downside pressure on the economy.
Many service sectors depend on customer density for their success. Unfortunately, such customer density can also act as a super spreader of the virus. Therefore, selected consumer service sectors, more so than other industries, will depend on widely available vaccines or therapeutics to resume more “normal” business levels. With the sizeable economic
With restaurants and other entertainment activities not fully open, many consumers instead enjoy such activities at home with friends. Even when vaccines become widely available, many of these home centered trends will likely continue in the “New Century.”contribution of consumer services, the timing and speed of an economic recovery will depend importantly on when vaccines become widely available.
As further focus on home centered trends, housing construction may provide a major impetus to an economic recovery. This impetus will depend, in part on stabilizing the virus outbreak or introduction of vaccines and therapeutics. In the past, housing contributed 18% to incremental GDP growth following each recession since 1970—with one exception. That one exception—the 2008 Great Financial Crisis. In contrast, fundamentals today, particularly low mortgage rates, should enable housing construction to contribute importantly to an eventual economic recovery.
Since 2007, housing declined nearly 2 million units while households grew 12 million. This combined effect led to the lowest level of vacancies in decades. This low vacancy rate should provide a spur to new housing demand. An eventual stronger housing recovery than after the Great Financial crisis will likely benefit a broad group of sectors that support new and secondary housing. Once again, the influence from the pandemic will likely see Americans refocus on the home---in this case a new house.
To avoid this substantial hit to the troubled economy, Congress will likely pass a Phase 4 spending program of at least $1 trillion that will either modify the weekly stipend and/or add new spending programs. The presidential election year plus importantly the resurging virus activity greatly increases the likelihood of this happening. Once Congress returns from its recess in late July, financial markets will closely watch its efforts to avoid this economic cliff. The outlook forBeginning in March, the Federal Reserve made massive commitments to supplying liquidity to the financial markets—nearly doubling its balance sheet. Nonetheless, monetary policy actions can only lend not spend. In contrast, fiscal policy can provide focused spending to the economy. Therefore, about the same time, Congress passed its Phase 3 $2.2 trillion fiscal program labeled the CARES Act. An important part of this program added a $600 weekly supplement to state unemployment insurance and the one-time Economic Impact Payment. The supplemental unemployment stipend proved critical to stabilizing personal incomes and consumer spending in the second quarter. Critically, this supplemental unemployment income program faces a July 31st termination date.
Recession — a Political Event In An Election Yearthe remainder of the year will importantly depend on additional fiscal spending. These substantial spending increases recalls a quote from a former Senate leader, to paraphrase, a trillion here, a trillion there, pretty soon you are talking about real money.
In our view, no matter the outcome of the election, surging deficits will ultimately force higher tax rates. However, tax rate increases may wait until signs that the recovery shows sustainable strength. Ultimate tax rate increases will force investors to reduce long-term earnings growth expectations for corporations. Some analysts point out that each one percent increase in effective corporate tax rates could lead to reducing earnings growth rates by over one percent annually.
The dynamism and ingenuity of American businesses and workers should enable them to take advantage of opportunities created by changes wrought by the pandemic. The resulting outcome of their efforts will likely speed up introduction of more productive systems—to the advantage of long-term U.S. economic growth. Equities of such quality companies, leveraging these opportunities, should produce above-average income and dividend growth producing attractive total returns. In the case of fixed income, short-term credits make sense in this period to preserve capital. Finally, alternative investments fit ideally into the environment described in this commentary.
One of the sharpest V recoveries in US equity market history. The equity markets bounced back quickly in the second quarter following one of the fastest and steepest declines in history. The markets moved on quickly from the sharp selloff that occurred in February and March amid concern for the coronavirus pandemic and its effect on global economies. From its low on March 23, the S&P 500 index gained 31% over a 26-day period. And though volatility remained elevated throughout the second quarter, with stock prices rising and falling on the news of the day, most major asset classes posted significant returns for the quarter.
U.S. large-cap equity returned 20.5% for the quarter, as measured by the S&P 500 TR index, in regaining much of the previous quarter’s losses. U.S. small-to mid-cap equity returned 26.6% for the quarter, as measured by the Russell 2500 TR index. Considered riskier than large caps, companies with smaller capitalizations were among those hit hardest during the pullback. A focus of fiscal stimulus, including the Paycheck Protection Program, small businesses employed nearly 48% of the American workforce in 2018 and are often the lifeblood of local communities. International equity markets saw strong performance in the second quarter, as well, though not as strong as domestic stocks. International developed markets large-cap equity returned 14.9% for the quarter, as measured by the MSCI EAFE NR USD index, while emerging markets equity returned 18.1% for the quarter, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets NR index.
The massive and unprecedented amounts of fiscal and monetary stimulus drove rates lower and compressed credit spreads throughout the quarter. Core fixed income returned 2.9% for the quarter, as measured by the Bloomberg Barclays U.S. Aggregate Bond TR index. Yields continued to fall, pushing prices higher. Lower-quality bonds benefited from the risk-on environment, which also helped corporate and municipal bonds. Intermediate-term, investment grade bonds helped balance risk in diversified portfolios.
Multi-alternative investments returned 4.9% for the quarter, as measured by the U.S. Fund Multi-alternative peer group. This asset class, valuable for its ability to provide diversification, underperformed equities and outperformed core fixed income, as would be expected.
Points to consider when reviewing markets and allocating asset classes:
Key Macro Points:
Key Asset Allocation Points:
As always, please feel free to contact us if you have any questions.
The information contained on this website is not intended to be used as the sole basis of investment decisions and is not a recommendation nor a solicitation to buy or sell any securities or investment. It is intended to be informational and educational. The information provided should be used as a general guide to investment performance. Past performance is no indication or guarantee of future results.
Copyright © 2024. All rights reserved.